Project Veritas Reveals the Stink of Democratic Corruption

Project Veritas has been ignored by the mainstream media

for revealing the corruption of Democrats across the country. These Democrats are not those in the highest circles. They aren't cronies of the DNC. Instead they are those who are supposed to be doing the honorable job of assisting Americans in their Patriotic duty.

The disgust at hearing volunteers admitting to disposing of voter registrations for any with a Republican straight ticket is nauseating. Seeing Project Veritas James O'Keefe removed from Twitter; his videos banned from YouTube remain further proof of an election rife with corruption. Silencing an American voice for unleashing truths to the world strikes at the right to free speech.

 Mainstream media continue to push the narrative these videos are selectively edited lies. If they are lies then why has more than one Democratic been fired with another quickly resigning? The most damning of all videos is one which dampens the argument Republicans are the only racists in this country. Video revealed a large Democratic donor referring to black Republicans as being f***ed in the head. The man goes so far as to compare these black Republicans to the Jewish guards who aided Nazis in exterminating Jews in concentration camps. Ironic claims when George Soros, a major  Clinton backer, was a Jewish Nazi collaborator in World War II.

The videos are almost unreal. If these were Republicans speaking the media would demonize every supporter. Investigations would flood the party's movements. Instead Project Veritas is quickly being silenced. Reporters attempt to spin hateful rants as being selectively edited. Selectively editing a video where black Republicans are referred to as sommerkommandos is unreal. If this is editing then in what context is it morally correct to call a black person f***ed in the head for their political views? 

Wikileaks has unveiled a party which is deplorable. Read the words of John Podesta. The campaign manager has no respect for the American people. Clinton should denounce his actions yet he remains at her side. The undying party loyalty Democrats show to such corruption is perplexing. Blind to anything but electing Clinton they do not see the disgust of rational Americans.

Millenials Lack Previous Generation's Diehard Party Loyalty

I'm outside with the smokers. They are the people

who stand apart from the bar atmosphere of loud music and closed groups. I prefer their company. Whether it's the booze or Halloween costumes everyone feels like talking. Talking about the social faux pas of the moment: politics.

The words are basic with no one wanting to admit just how divided the country is. I expect here, in the heart of a place known for Democratic leaning, to find diehard Hillary supporters. Dracula abruptly makes an exit on broaching Clinton corruption. "You vote for who you want, I'll vote for who I want. Doesn't matter what you say!" Surprisingly touchy he stalks to the edge of street. I'm not surprised.

The ones who remain admit freely they are voting Green Party. They are blatantly honest about their candidate winning. "Then why bother?" My interest is peaked. "Change." Their belief is in finally putting a real third party on the map. One free of the Democrat-Republican bullshit. "That chance ended with Ralph Nader" is my best attempt to explain I see scant hope of a revolution the globalists will never allow. 

A young man speaks up from the fringe of our smoky group. "I'm voting Libertarian." He's not a liberal. The Libertarian party is different but the alcohol makes for little explanation and he wanders off in search of a better topic. 

The rest slowly drift away until a James Dean clone remains with a man in a hideous fur coat. "You're not from around here." His voice is much softer as though we are the only two still speaking. I haven't lived in the city since graduating from college. These bars are not the places I can be found. He knows the lake I live on. The same eccentric millionaire with a passion for hoarding who receives a cold glance from the surrounding neighborhood. Both of us don't see the problem with a man resembling Santa Clause who turned his back on the business world. "We're different. The two of us. We see it differently." He's brutally honest of his shame to admit he doesn't share his friend's views. Whether this means he supports Trump or refuses to vote completely never emerges. Touchy Dracula returns to forcefully explain they are leaving.

I take their cue to return to the dim bar scene where my friends await. They too are voting Green Party. Amidst their strongly Democratic neighborhood they remain proud voters for a party which will never win. Their vote never wavers. Every year it's always for a party which stands alone from the ones sharply dividing this country's future. Only this election year they are being joined by more than a simple few. I suddenly am seeing signs everywhere this election is different. Millennials don't live by diehard loyalties to a party. Why should they? Neither represents the change they see as imperative for a new future. 

Their fervor gives me a glimpse of hope into America's future. This new generation lacks the diehard party stance. For years people have defined themselves by years of being Democrats or Republicans. They are so static in loyalty it blinds them to their candidate's faults. This is what makes me disagree with the James Dean clone. We are not 'different.' All of us feel a drastic change is the only route to saving this country. The old generation of voters and the media (especially the media!) would be smart to recognize fear over a specific political party in the White House is an outdated tool. Candidates are being judged on themselves, sans party. If they are not enough the millennials will choose another route.

British Press Stupidly Dumbfounded at Response to 'Unaccompanied Minor' Appearance

Britain's newest unaccompanied minors from the Calais

Jungle arrived with towels over faces to 'protect' their identity. Measures taken only after the initial unaccompanied minors were met with disbelief by their readers. Damage control articles scolded readers 'these are those most vulnerable' 'their appearance is only a byproduct of war or background' 'Ignore the obvious signs of adulthood!.' No medical checks necessary as the department continues to go off vague requirements relying heavily on a minor's declaration of age sans proof.

Each new blunder by the Home Office on the insistence to not bother with medical checks digs the press into a futher hole. For months they fed images of sweet toddlers holding dirty blankies, mothers clutching innocent babies, and families broken-hearted in the midst of deplorable refugee camps. These were the vulnerable ones they cried! How can a people be so selfish as to close their borders to those most desperately in need of help?! Shame on any who refuse to open a home to them! 

The heartbreaking images were a complete mockery when fourteen teenagers and young men stepped off a bus fresh from the Calais Jungle into the arms of a waiting crowd. How ironic to see those most vulnerable contained no teary toddlers, no young mothers with sweet babes, and lacked a single girl. Girls, the sex most vulnerable in the Calais camp, the ones most at risk of sexual assault in an environment predominantly of men from cultures whose views on women vary greatly. Are there no vulnerable unaccompanied girls in Calais? Are There no pregnant woman in Calais in dire need of adequate prenatal care? Has the press not been spending months using their images to evoke a movement to open British borders to them? 

Every press member who did their best to hide the blatant fact most 'refugees' are young men deserve the public's ire. The carefully crafted story unraveled before the public on the day those unaccompanied minors arrived. Scolding the public for their disgust at finding the vast majority refugees to not be the innocent mothers and children they toted is dumbfounding. The press has only one option to save what fragile trust the public holds in their words. Admit the farce they have been perpetuating since the refugee crisis began. Kindly remove their cranium from up their posterior. Finally stop pissing on the public with half-truths and return to their purpose: telling the facts without the BS.

Refugees Welcome Everywhere Except With the Wealthy of Lake Como

In the words of Come Fly With Me's, Ian Foot,"keep 'em out"

is the new welcome theme for the residents of Lake Como. Residents who include George Clooney have berated the regular folk on their reluctance to open communities where the native people are themselves struggling.  Communities which have been villianized for wanting to keep refugees from overrunning their towns. Now the same refugees have been turned away from Swiss borders for illegal entry to flood the celebrity paradise of Lake Como.

The wealthy of Lake Como have vacation homes which overflow with empty rooms. Thirty for George Clooney with seventy alone for Donatella Versace. While hundreds of towns have single homes already full with residents, they are pressed to provide space where none exists. Surely these 'generously outspoken' celebrities are giving rides on their private yachts and opening at least one of their mansions to give refugees a temporary home while they wait on asylum applications. Those who are should feel free to come forward as an example to the common folk. Instead they cry over the presence of the refugees they urged Europe to openly welcome.

"Not in our town!" "They will be disasters for tourists!" Refugees sleeping under bridges and in their train stations are a blot on the space known for pandering to presidents, royalty, and film stars. Refugee camp visits and stern lectures surrounded by body guards are wonderful for the cause so long as one can take a first class even private jet back to the safety of their mansions.The true test of their care over human strife is not how much money can safely be given to keep those same people in someone else's backyard. Money means little when a person lies shivering in a gutter while those do-gooders dine in splendor above them. Surely now is the time to show the world they are more than part-time caregivers. Refugees who were told are welcomed by open arms by them get the reality those words strictly apply so long as they stay well away from their personal space.

Those who believe it is only the wealthy of Lake Como spotlighting this behavior must take a wide panorama of those who push hardest for the world to open their borders. How many of these refugees are arriving in America for a comfortable stay in a Clinton mansion or the empty Chicago home of Barack Obama? Those with the loudest voices who have an excess of empty rooms should be the greatest example of an open heart not just an open wallet. They announced there is room for all so it's about time they offer up one of those empty rooms for a refugee in need of it. Until the world starts to see their example hypocrites should keep the age-old saying: silence is golden.

US News Women Vs Trump Ignores Female Voter's Right to Choose

US News released the article Women vs. Trump in a vagina

crusade for Hillary Clinton. The author makes use of the 'shame on a woman' for not supporting her own kind. The XX chromosome has become Clinton's defining factor for the American woman voter's choice. Donald Trump's clear appreciation for a good-looking woman makes him a monster thereby overruling a woman's intellectual decision to choose the next president.

Hillary Clinton's crusade for women led to the infamous campaign woman's card. The card which features a bathroom style depiction of a woman on a pretty pink background congratulating women for donating to the Clinton campaign. The funds, which go to Clinton, not women's support groups in dire need of donations, is another sad example of how gender skewed this election has become.  

Trump has made sexist comments on woman. He is no angel when it comes to speaking his mind. He is also not being investigated by the FBI. His emails do not reveal a long line of corruption leading back to the Clinton Foundation's shady past of taking money from countries who stifle women's rights. Unfair pay for women is prominent in the Clinton foundation. Male executives make more than 30% to their gender counterparts. Women vs Trump mentions none of these facts. The sole purpose is depicting Donald Trump as a pig making Hillary Clinton the women savior.

The author's words are a slap in the face to women who have spent hours researching Hillary Clinton. Not because she is a woman. She is a presidential candidate which has absolutely NOTHING to do with a person's gender. Whether a candidate is a woman plays no role in their abilities to manage America's future. Ironically the one who most seems the need to discuss the subject is Hillary Clinton herself. For the record any being who spends 600 dollars on a haircut needs a reality check. Of course people are going talk about it. The average American has a thousand better ways to use the funds. If Bernie Sanders were getting $600 dollar hair cuts it would be a hot Twitter topic. Not for his gender but his lack of decency about openly spending on such a frivoulous item when thousands are struggling to make ends meet.

Americans deserve the acknowledgement their sex is beholden to no candidate. If this election were a gender war then Hillary Clinton would have the female votes while the male voters would be restricted to XY candidates only. Males have every right to make a vote based not on sex. Yet women are being boxed into a bizarre shaming of candidate choice. If equal rights for both sexes exist in this country then men should have the courtesy to pen the same type of article without ridicule. Instead they would get decimated for being a sexist who chose based upon gender. Females are above this and it frankly reeks. Stop making the election a chromosomal war. Report on a candidate's qualifications and leave biological sex at the door. 

Forget Goldman Sachs Speeches Hillary Clinton Looks Into Trump´s Tax Returns

Hillary Clinton promised months ago to ¨look into¨ releasing

the transcripts of her Goldman Sachs speeches. The speeches have been at the center of a debate over her shady relationship with the Wall Street financial sector. Few voters can deny money speaks more than words. Clinton´s campaign knows this. They have a history of delaying answers until the American public no longer takes notice.

The Clintons are masters at avoidace techniques and with Bernie Sanders front and center they struggled to find an adequate answer. If the Republicans had battled for a nominee longer Clinton might have been forced to do serious damage control. Donald Trump´s surprising win has been a blessing to the Clinton avoidance club. Her campaign is doing what it does best. Creating a boogeyman with dark secrets to hide the cesspool in their own background.

Donald Trump´s refusal to release his tax returns is being scandalized. Clinton casting herself as the conquering hero intent on rooting out the truth of their existence. Her hope is by expending all their energy into ´looking into´ Donald Trump the American people will blindly follow. The technique worked with her private email server. By dragging out the time period for handing over the information many Americans became sick of the story. The details overlooked in favor of more recent scandals. 

Irony lies in how much time she has had to ´look into´ her own business but miraculously avoids it by grasping at Trump´s political straws. The American people will not find a reminder of her speeches in the media. They continue to gloss over what Goldman Sachs employees present at the speeches call more of a congratulations on jobs well done than harsh scolding. Who cares if the wealthier will be getting wealthier off an already struggling American public. Trump´s tax returns are the greater evil! 

If Americans fall into such a petty trap then the future is a terrifying one. The media will continue to ignore what questions need to be asked. Candidates will win via celebrity scandals more than comparison of their political platforms. Part of those political platforms are a candidate´s proof they act for the country, not their personal financial gains. If Hillary Clinton is to be believed as not being Wall Street´s puppet then Americans need a reason to believe it. Release the speeches Hillary Clinton or own up to where your true loyalities lie.

FBI Corrects Hillary Clinton: This is an Investigation Not Security Inquiry

Hillary Clinton´s campaign has toted the FBI´s

continuing investigation as little more than a pesky security inquiry. Campaign supporters wove the idea into the tangled explanation for what should have been a disqualification for their presidential nominee. Security inquiries sound as innocent as kindly asking the sweet old lady how well-protected her house is against a break-in.

Yesterday FBI director, James Comey, dismissed Hillary Clinton´s delicate ´security inquiry´ description. Speaking on Hillary Clinton´s referral of the FBI´s work as a security inquiry Comey had this to say:

“I don’t know what that {term security inquiry}  means," "We’re conducting an investigation. That’s the bureau’s business. That’s what we do."

One reporter clearly missed the word investigation repeating Clinton´s reference to a ´security inquiry´ to Comey. His response could not have been any clearer for the lone reporter. 

The word "investigation" -- "it’s in our name,” “And I’m not familiar with the term ‘security inquiry.’”

 Finally the truth spelled out for the world. Hillary Clinton is under an FBI investigation. Not a security review or inquiry. The potential presidential nominee is under official FBI investigation and the American media is more concerned over Comey questioning Clinton´s description of the situation then its´ severity.  

FBI investigations once spelled instant doom for a candidate´s qualifications as president of the United States.  The Federal Bureau of Investigation does not involve itself in simple legal matters. To spend millions on Hillary Clinton´s case speaks volumes about how concerned the American people should be. The media once investigated FBI matters with respect given to their judgement. Today papers care more about Hillary Clinton´s side where the FBI´s work is a mere question of their wording against hers.

Clinton supporters should be the most adamant for a media to be honest about their candidate. If she is completely honest then the FBI should be spelling out the proof. Instead they continue to swear the FBI investigation is just a disguise for right-wing Republican conspiracy. Never mind the FBI director was nominated for the position by President Obama himself. Presidential decisions become irrelevant when the letter R follows Comey´s name. If political affiliation continues to battle a person´s qualifications the FBI are in danger of permanently losing the respect of the American people. Their actions will tell the American people who holds the real power in this election. 

Prioritizing Gender Education Over Biological Sex Education Dangerous for Transgender Health Care

The battle over Trans versus Cis gender rights to freely use bathrooms and locker rooms highlights the

dangerous future in health care for transgender. Gender is being toted as more important than the sex individuals are born with. The concept of modern gender is fluid. Men no longer need identify as men. Women no longer are required to identify as women. The importance in choosing a gender is an individual´s choice which society allows them to freely make. Whether bathroom bills should or should not exist is not the point of this article.

The importance of an individual´s biological sex must be equalized with their gender identity. This is not saying those born with penises or vaginas must be labeled male or female. Instead it is sounding the alarm of ´pretending´ biological sex makes no difference in healthcare needs. The reality is few research is available to help doctors make sensitive issues into very real health concerns. Those who identify as the opposite sex but do not transition must be fully aware there identification does not eliminate the need for proper doctors. Identifying men with female sex organs should still see a gynecologist to monitor for conditions like ovarian cancer, endometriosis, or uterine hemorrhaging. The same applies to a man identifying as a woman with male biological sex organs. The risk of prostate cancer still exists.

Transgender healthcare sorely lacks longterm detailed research in hormone therapy treatments. Estrogen and Tetosterone are not play pills. The bodies relationship with both hormones is immensely complex. Throw one slightly off imbalance and health conditions can spring up in even the fittest individual. Now combine this in children who are meant to enter puberty when hormones go slightly ´insane.´The transgender children of today who use hormone therapies to stall the body´s natural transistion should have all potential risks explained to them. They are essentially agreeing to be the human trials most studies require years of research approval to try. There have been no animal trials to hint if there bodies will face deadly health complications down the line.  The idea of allowing a child to undergo treatments which have no proven research down the line, which could lead to serious even deadly health complications, violates the promise to do no harm to a patient.

Focusing equally on the healthcare needs of biological sex does not diminish an individual´s importance to gender identification. This opens the pathway to greater discussion on how transgender plays into a healthy community. Transgender individuals who do transistion are most in need of this discussion. They face the uncertainty of how changing the outward biological sex will play into legitimate concerns of what risks still apply to inside biological sex organs. Most concerning is fully transgendered fears over visiting a doctor only to face discrimination instead of care. Research has shown many opt to avoid doctors rather then take the risk. Little good is there for a transgender member to feel comfortable in the woman´s bathroom when poorly educated doctors don´t treat their medical needs. Without media focus on health care the transgender community faces a difficult future.

The Gun Free Zone Safety Net has a Gaping Hole in It

Gun Free Zones rely on the principle all citizens follow the rules. The Gun Free Zone sign is meant to remind citizens unauthorized individuals face severe penalties if caught carrying a gun within a believed school zone. Hillary Clinton stands behind it. Donald Trump promises to get rid of it.

The Gun Free Zone Act was signed into law in 1990. The idea is a safety net protecting Americans from deadly shooting sprees. In a utopian society the idea would work flawlessly. Citizens would never lie. Little signs would turn back the Virginia Tech shooter from murdering innocent students. Columbine would never have happened.

Reality proves gun free zones have done nothing for school shootings. Killers are not deterred by ´that´s illegal´ threats. History shows a pattern of violence being greatest in ´soft target´ area. The gun free zone is a neon sign there is no opposition to fear. Police stations and gun shows rarely find themselves assaulted by gun shootings because they provide an actual threat a shooter will be stopped before achieving their goal.

Critics insisting the Gun Free Zone, while not able to stop shooters, still provides protection from regular gun carriers are naive. The former high school I attended had its first shooting experience at a basketball game held in their gym. One parent, unauthorized with no legal carry allowance, pulled a gun on another over family matters. The Gun Free Zone was clearly marked. The perpetrator was carrying illegally with complete disregard of the ´safety net.´ He fired several shots at the person whom the disagreement was with before being subdued. The Gun Free Zone did nothing to prevent this. Would another parent legally carrying a gun have helped the situation before it escalated? Perhaps. Perhaps it would have backfired leading to serious injuries. 

The greater question asks ´why do we insist on gun-free zones when they are proven not to be effective?´ Do the American people need a sign pointing to places where dutiful citizens are going to be helpless to defend themselves? If Gun Free Zones are little more than guns with an x marked through them should Americans feel safe? Let´s hope not. 

American Media Gives Hillary Clinton Free Pass on Policy

America´s news coverage of Hillary Clinton is about as

useful as celebrity gossip magazines. Questions on foreign policy plans for America´s role in the Libyan disaster have been replaced with opinion pieces on Clinton´s imminent win over Donald Trump. Bo Copley´s legitimate concern over the future of coal mining flashed by with ludicrous speed. American soldiers are dying in foreign wars without a tweet to mourn their passing. Clinton is being asked about her defense against Donald Trump´s attacks on her husband´s infidelity. American media is asking all the wrong questions and its´ citizens will pay the price.

Clinton´s continual focus on gun control is a heinous example of this. Clinton´s campaign exploits of gun victims in the media blasts America´s right to bear arms. Executive orders by Clinton will begin placing further restrictions on who is able to legally purchase a gun. These are irrelevant when guns are easily smuggled over the border from Mexico. Clinton´s belief in strangleholds on legitimate buyers are not going to be followed by illegal sellers. Heroin is illegal to purchase in the United States yet the law has never hindered users from finding the means to procure it nor will laws stop illegal gun purchases. Reporters should be asking how Clinton intends to tightly secure the border against all contraband before she begins a mistaken crusade to penalize law-abiding legal gun owners.

Finally, if the American media will not ask the most important question then I beg the global media to do it: Hillary Clinton what is your EXACT plan on America´s future role in global affairs? No BS on ´we will do our best´ or ´work with our allies.´ The Clinton Foundation´s shady past of convenient donations followed by favors from Clinton´s stint as secretary of state has cost thousands of lives. How can global citizens, NOT government leaders, believe America has enough decency to do what is right in this world.  

Why does your nation keep meddling in foreign affairs when the beneficiary is clearly not the people? The world is not talking about the Iraq war under Bush but the Libyan debacle under your tenure as Secretary of State. No sane individual believes the split decision where the most important guidance came from the lips of the SOS did not sway the president´s decision. What benefit was the coup in Honduras which the media tiptoed around leaving Americans in the dark about their role? Obama quakes under Putin´s glare while relations sour before being saved. Why should America be trusted to a 3rd term of an administration which has done so much global destruction? 

Good-bye Felons. Hello ´Person Who Committed a Crime´ as Your Newest Coworker

The Office of Justice program has unleashed the politically correct ´less disparaging label´ for convicts

and felons on the American people. Felons and convicts are now to be labeled as ´person who committed a crime´ and ´individual who was incarcerated.´ The idea is to ¨remove barriers¨ for those leaving prison to reintegrate into society. President Obama announced a plans which would require federal agencies to do their part employing background checks only at the final phase of hiring. Executive presidential orders from Hillary Clinton would ensure the new regulations are standard in American society.

The thought is interesting. The reality is terrifying. Convicts and felons do deserve a second chance at becoming successful members of law-abiding communties. Glossing over their crimes is not the way to accomplish it. The regulations umbrella does not differentiate between crimes committed. Money laundering is a crime. Murder is a crime. Shoplifting is a crime. Rape is a crime. Employers face the agonizing choice of taking the gamble on what crime their future employee committed. 

American parents cringe at the placement of convicted child molesters allowed housing in their neighborhood.The thought of a person convicted of multiple accounts of money laundering in the financial department of their local banks should make them wary of where to place their savings. Persons with repeated jail time over dealing prescription pain killers are a dangerous wager for work in the store pharmacy. With employers only hint being ´committed a crime´  and ´individual who was incarcerated´ puts their livelihood at risk. There is little forgiveness if the media uncovers a rape at the local high school was the school´s error for hiring a person who served time for multiple rape accounts. 

The lasting result of one mishire leading to a crime makes it more difficult for businesses to take a risk on choosing a candidate ´who committed a crime´ over the less experienced crime free applicant. Wariness over an unknown will hurt those who have reformed chances at integrating into society. Offer a second chance but do so without risking the trust of law-abiding Americans. The Office of Justice would be wise to consider this before making another politically correct decision.

Hillary Clinton´s Woman Card is Sadder than Her Campaign Slogan

Hillary Clinton´s woman card has netted her a tidy

profit of $2.4 million. Instead of donating the money to causes for women it will go towards funding a campaign which has forgotten how intelligent women are. From the disastrous comments of Gloria Steinem to Maragret Thatcher´s own political gaffe the Clinton campaign is a mess of women contradictions. 

The Clinton campaign has brutally toted the idea Hillary is THE answer to women garnering the respect they deserve. The idea of a woman with historically unheard of untrustworthy polling numbers being the one to ´save´ us is hilarious. Women do deserve their turn in the White House. One day it will happen but the day Hillary Clinton takes her Oval Office throne will not be it. What will our children think when they are old enough to ask the question: what did Hillary Clinton do to deserve this honor? 

She is under investigation by the FBI. Her supporters will claim conspiracy and ´security review´ but the FBI itself called it an investigation. Her emails reveal a women rife with political scandals which have been a disaster for all Americans, not just the women. Read her own words not the main stream media spin or yesterday´s speeches before crying ´it´s an attack on all women.´ Do not make the mistake of believing women are incapable of seeing the truth. Our children will be raised in a world where gender does not overrule the ability for a president to make good choices. Gender should not define a voter´s decision to choose who is poised to take this country to a stronger place. 

Hillary Clinton´s own political slogan is a pander towards women claiming ´I´m with Her.´ Why is it not ´I´m with the person most capable to lead this country. Where are the words which speak to the American people? ´I´m with her´ sounds more like a child´s t-shirt slogan. ´I´m with her,´ the lady over there is my mother. ´I´m with her´ could even be an excellent shirt for my puppy. He belongs to me therefore ´I´m with her.´ A world where voter´s follow a slogan implying they need to point out who they are with is a sad one. If Hillary Clinton hopes to win over America´s vote she should start with analyzing her own view of them. No voter needs a card reminding them of their own sex. The next time I spot one I will be asking ´when was the last time you used the funds for that card to support a women´s cause, not just Hillary Clinton´s?´

Hillary Clinton´s Million Dollar Super Pac of Trolls

Hillary Clinton´s campaign is unleashing its´ latest

combat scheme: Operation troll. The soft explanation for the super-pac is to set negative rumors straight, protect supporters, and give them a safe place to voice Hillary support. There are thousands of places where this already exists. No one needs to spend a dime of super pac funds to do it. What the latest super pac is about is shutting up the free speech opinions of non-paid voices. 

The pathetic truth is how bland a candidate must be to pay its supporters for their enthusiasm. The idea is not new. Twitter has found thousands of Hillary followers do not exist. Facebook likes can easily be purchased. YouTube offers the opportunity to purchase ´views´ to boost a video´s popularity. No one batted an eye at funding background enthusiasm but paying trolls will turn calm commentary debates into insult battles.

Furious Trump supporters on Reddit have devoted posts calling for memes to piss off the ´ole bitch.´ Pacifist users have flooded calmer plans to deal with paid trolls. Ignore their antics. Hit the dislike button. Move on to serious political discussions over a candidate instead of personal attacks on a person´s mental capacity. Paid supporters will find a wall blocking their attempts to ´protect´ Hillary Clinton. 

The true supporter will face the repercussions of a wasted million dollar attempt to win over voters. Why listen to a supporter who may just be parroting what they are being paid to say? Even worse is the respect lost when a supporter needs cuddling to speak up about their political beliefs. This is the internet. If a commenter is offensive they are within their rights to move on. No one is a martyr for staying in a rude conversation over political beliefs. Stop acting the victim. No one is respecting you for it.

Bernie Sanders is Going to Vatican City (and Here´s Why)

BBC News released the newest example of media ignorance

entitled ´US Elections: Bernie Sanders Invited to Vatican by Pope.´ Before the public´s heads start spinning with political dramatics the facts have to be examined. Chancellor Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo invited Bernie Sanders to the Vatican City State for the Centesimus Annus 25 Years later. 

The Centesimus Annus is a symposium held by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. Pope John Paul II established the Potifical Academy of Social Sciences in 1994 ¨so that the Holy Father and all Vatican offices would have access to the most current social scientific research relevant to the Church’s teaching.¨ Three years prior Saint John Paul II had begun the church´s efforts to improve the content of church teaching through interactions with social scientists. The 25 Years Later Centesimus Annus symposium participants will discuss the question of how the past 25 years have changed the world´s ¨situation-economically, politically, and culturally.¨ Secondly the symposium ¨will investigate how Catholic social teaching has engaged the world in order to ask how best the Church can do so in the coming years and decades.¨

The two day event will go as follows: One participant will present their authored paper on the subject being discussed.  They are followed by a respondent. All participants then discuss the information presented. Lunch, dinner, and coffee break will be provided for both days of the symposium. The full itinerary detailing the participants and papers to be discussed is in the official conference booklet on the PASS site.

Bernie Sanders is not listed to present an authored paper but The Academy´s statement of ¨generous listening to the multiplicity of “grass-roots” groups and movements around the globe¨ points to Bernie Sanders as a welcome part of the discussion. His invitation by Chancellor Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo suggests an appreciation of common ground in the issue of climate change, a topic which will be part of the Academy´s agenda. The invitation to be part of the symposium is a landmark in Sander´s grassroot campaign movement. His views have now expanded beyonded the race for Democratic nominee to an international discussion. 

__________

The offical press release from the Bernie Sanders campain:
 https://berniesanders.com/press-release/sanders-visit-vatican-city

For more information on the Centeminus Annus symposium (and the quotes) visit: http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/events/2014-18/centesimus_annus.html

Author

L.Krause
Freelance writer with a sense of humor and passion for politics

Hillary´s Campaign Needs to Up Their Game

Hillary Clinton has the best campaign managers money and

politics can buy. She should be steam-rolling Bernie Sanders into submission. The people on her team are veterans in the art of winning elections. They run campaigns capable of reducing most opposing candidates to tears of frustration. Make no mistake about it, they are intelligent men and women with a staggering amount of experience. Millenials shoud be slavishly following Hillary except they aren´t. Bernie Sanders is besting their campaign manipulations and here´s why.

1. They don´t ´comprehend´ the unheard of Bernie Sanders approach to politics. Bernie Sanders is unusual in the world of politics, he may even be an enigma. His ads do not feature Hillary Clinton and her shady background. They do not start as ´Hillary Clinton has...´ or ´Hillary Clinton would...´ so vote for me because her negativities are destroying you. Bernie Sanders ads focus on the people not the person running opposite of him. Campaign ads are not supposed to do that. Traditional campaigns slam one person for their choices in hope voters will be scared into avoiding someone who is shadier than thou. By not pointing traditional fingers Bernie Sanders will continue to distance himself in terms of trustworthiness.

2. They don´t comprehend the beauty of the internet. Statements made in previous elections could be taken as true because very few people were able to go back and research the details. Now anything said can be typed into Google. Hillary is not used to just how easily she can be refuted with the touch of a finger. Claim you did not know where Bernie was while fighting for health care begins a hilarious joke when a video easily surfaces where he is standing literally behind you. Hillary´s campaign must fully understand the consequence of her every statement in a world where the past is now accessed by anyone with access to the world wide web.

3. They underestimate the power of millenial voters. Millenial voters have been raised in a different world then the one Hillary´s political aspirations began. They have a different way of thinking about the world. Flaunting ´she has more experience´ does not cut it today. Millenials are looking for a candidate who is focused on their future. Hillary Clinton´s recent behaviors are on the forefront in the millenial mind. Hillary´s supporters  bring up her work done in the early nineties but many millenials are either to young to recall them or weren´t even born. This may actually be an advantage to Hillary as her past is not exactly known for being saintly.

4. They entirely miss the boat when it comes to ´tone.´ I was shocked at the statements made by Hillary supporters Gloria Steinem and Margaret Thatcher. ´Scolding´ potential female voters on their lack of feminism for not voting for a female felt humiliating. Throw in the recent CNN Benenson interview where Hillary´s campaign complained over Bernie´s negativity felt downright petty. Attempts to ply voters by continually playing the sexist card is poorly done even damaging. The campaign reeks of condescension when Hillary scolds Bernie supporters with her ´I pity them´ statements. Expecting voters to not understand why certain debate days are ridiculous on her behalf makes even supporters question why she doesn´t want to show off her prowess in the spotlight. She can point the finger at Bernie´s tone all she likes. The more she does it, the less respect is gained. To be a strong woman one should be fighting not whining over how ´unfair´ politics are.

5. They fail at facing scandal. Hillary Clinton´s trustworthy ratings are not just bad compared to Bernie Sanders, they are disastrous. She ducks the issues. She throws excuses. Bernie Sanders bluntly says what he means. Instead of continually blaming the GOP, Bernie supporters, and every scapegoat imaginable their candidate MUST take a stance. If Hillary Clinton has no intention of ever releasing the transcripts to her Goldman Sachs speeches then call a press conference to say so. If she is innocent of wrongdoing in her tenure as Secretary of State then step up and publically take a united stance. If she wants to continue using Super PACs which support fossil fuel use then admit it. The American people have grown wary of the media. They do not like being told what ´should be´ by a panel of ´experts´ instead of a candidate themselves. Secondhand statements will never receive the respect of a candidate proudly declaring their own words loud and clear. Until her campaign does damage control expect a lot more hilarious memes in the future.

Top 25 Funny Hillary Clinton Memes

Political candidate memes are sweeping the world wide web and Hillary Clinton is no creative exception. More are sure to follow but as of February 12th 2016 here are the top 25 funniest Hillary Clinton memes. Laugh on!

¨Blame the Circuspants...I mean Circumstance¨

¨1,000 Words. This picture is worth ´em¨

¨Hillary´s Prison Fashions Make a Debut¨

¨Hillary Blows the Mind of Jackie Chan¨

¨The Meaning of Gmail¨

¨The Evolution of Hillary Explained¨

¨Word of the Day¨

¨Well...that´s Awkward¨

¨Trumping the Line¨

¨Confused Candy¨

¨Catch and Release¨

¨Hill Gets Played¨

¨Exxxccceellleeennttt¨

¨I´m With Stupid¨

¨Life´s a Bitch¨

¨Back to the Failure¨

¨Witch Hunt¨

¨OMG That was so Me!¨

¨Brain Surgery for Hillary¨

¨Always room for dead voters¨

¨Textual Relations¨

¨Hell Hath No Fury As..¨

¨Always Did Advertise as ´Two for One¨

¨Say what?¨

¨Stay Shady¨